Travel sites like the trip advisor and similar can be hugely damaging to any business and gives customers a platform where they can really go all out to poison reputations and destroy businesses completely. While honest feedback is always appreciated, especially constructive responses that aid any industry in their on going training, maintenance, product sourcing and general “up keep” of the business in their effort to exceed customer satisfaction, most times vidictive remarks and comments left on trip advisor is a direct result of a customer who “didn’t get his own way”. There are many ways to sort out a problem and going directly to management level or above, problems are almost always resolved so those people addicted to trip advisor, in my opinion, should put their talents to some constructive use and perhaps start writing articles to keep their grubby little paws busy.

The feedback on TripAdvisor are of great distress to many a small business who, if not 100% accommodating to customes with regards to discounts and free bees are constantly threatened and basically black mailed that the customer will use trip advisor and similar sites to damage them. It is such a shame that so few people take the time to write about their good experiences. If industrys, especially resorts and hotels, could put everything that is said about them in their guest comment book at their reception desks, on TripAdvisor, they would then score TOP MARKS, but that will be unethical and seen as “self marketing”. Travel sites like TripAdvisor can be very damaging, as the statistics for any service industry shows; only 1 out of 10 customers will pass on their positive feedback, where if they had a bad experience, 8 out of 10 will tell about 10 people and so the circle of destruction starts nevermind those who get their family and friends to join them on their disaster campaign. In one case that we studied, regardless of the negative comments on trip advisor, the resort was still no 8 of the Top Hotels on Zanzibar… In the case where a site like TripAdvisor with 8 million members, it could be devastating for any business. Off course if the customer is paying for a service, their expectation is to receive good service / enjoy a good product and for any serious business, the aim should be to exceed that expectation. An interesting question came up: What if the guest was under the wrong impression and the wrong expectation was created even before they have set foot on the resorts premises?  This is exactly what happened with one guest that wrote negative feedback of the 30th of September about Mtoni Marine resort in Zanzibar. They were sold a 4 star hotel. Anyone living on Zanzibar would tell you that it is very difficult if not impossible to put a star rating to any hotel there. As a South African with many friends in Zanzibar, I can tell you that if I was sold a room in a 4 star hotel and I arrived at Mtoni Marine resort, I would be very disappointed. But….it wouldn’t be the resorts fault….it would be the fault of the person who sold it to me and in order to close the deal, painted a four star picture.

As stated in all of Mtoni resorts marketing material they are “as laid back as home”, they are a family friendly resort, they are the only private beach outside of Stone Town. They do not have TV’s in the rooms, they do not have mini-bars, they do not have room service and they do not have telephones in the rooms. All items that would be associated with a 4 star hotel. They are what they are and they would never apologise for that. BUT….. if a tour operator sells Mtoni to an agent here in South Africa who then sells it to a client and everyone is making money in the process, by the time the client has paid, they have a certain expectation. Mtoni Marine cannot meet that expectation if everyone has added a mark-up to the original price and in most cases a huge mark-up. Mtoni are most certainly not a 4 star hotel, but it is a  beautiful resort with all the special touches that makes them unique and have many a regular guest returning year after year. But nevertheless, if sold as a four star in South Africa (or anywhere in the world) and customer is disappointed after arrival, who is actually to blame here?  Then….. someone goes onto the trip advisor and writes the biggest load of bull but omits to tell the world that he arrived at the resort with a very different expectation and he doesn’t tell the world that his favourite travel agency in South Africa sold the resort to him as a four star resort.  Oh no….that part is left out and the world is left to think that Mtoni is the shittiest resort on the island.

I could write pages and pages on small businesses who have been wrongfully damaged by defiant, rude, obnoxious clients or customers and I could get justification from the businesses for all comments left on the trip advisor, but what I can’t do, is explain some human beings attitudes. There are (unfortunately) just some people that you can’t keep happy…..ever!!!  If these kind of people choose to spend their entire stay at the resort or hotel not talking to each other and just shouting at staff or beating one another up…..exceeding guests expectations is very difficult.  Perhaps all of the trip advisor viewers, trying to make up your mind about a particular hotel, resort, service…and you’re looking at the trip advisor for the answers…it might be a great idea to read between the lines before allowing the comments to change your mind on the hotel or resort that you had in mind from the beginning.

sent anonymously via email

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 27th, 2009 at 3:38 pm and is filed under South Africa News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 comments so far

 1 

No amount of counter attacks against TripAdvisor is going to change the fact that thousands of people use it and many thousands more will do so in the future too, now it is so accessible from your Iphone.
May I suggest your article displays the very extreme that you so despise from TripAdvisor reviewers.
TripAdvisor is a tool, you should read it to help you make a judgment. Just how many reviews has the complainant written and how many are positive? – that should give you a clue to whether they habitually slag places off. Are they are frequent contributors too.
TripAdvisor could help by having a 3 month, 6 month, year and 3 year overview. Then you can see if the place is improving or falling behind.
Many large hotels pay a fortune for companies to do independent reviews, here is the chance for the small guy to get the same sort of service for nothing.
Hoteliers and restaurateurs should monitor their reviews and answer in full the negative ones.
I believe the consumer is cleverer than you give them credit for, they can use the service like they would any review site – Amazon, Ebay and others have consumer feedback. I saw a review of Sony by a consumer on Amazon about a TV – other consumers directly said take no notice this TV has only been available for 3 months and has a minimum warrantee of 3 years – so how come this reviewer says he has had no refund after 22 months?
Small hoteliers should get satisfied consumers to give them favorable reviews.
QED
I am happy to help anyone interested in genuine quality improvement – including their TripAdvisor scoring.
http://www.david.wood.co.nr

October 27th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Sunil Krothwal
 2 

Trip Advisor has become a tool to access the value of a travel product before the consumer buys it. The hotels have started providing Trip Advisor link to their website.

There are 4 main points that have surfaced here

1. Role of websites and increase in buyers’ power
2. Negative role of Trip Advisor
3. Guests expectations mismatch with services offered
4. Travel agent mark up price

We can talk at length about these but that might not help as we cannot control the external factors. The damage can be minimised by taking some concrete steps at the premises and being proactive.

We use the websites to market ourselves and the consumers use these websites to share their experience. The negative experience shared by the guest is a further opportunity to contact him and bring him back although at some cost.

The damage from the negative remarks can be controlled by promptly replying to the negative response. There can be another step that can be taken by providing a link to the in house guest comments from the customers who visited the hotel. That can be done by retyping the comments on a link page of by scanning the comment card and providing it on the web link provided. The best option that the hotels are yet to take advantage of is, by sending a link to the guests email the day before he checks out so that the hotel manager can read the comments and can contact the guest before the guest checks out .

If we are sure that we provide good service to our targeted clients, I am sure the guests who visit us can filter the comments and can make their own decisions

The other point is the contact of the hotel and guest before arrival. Before the guest arrives we can send him a copy of our services, the registration card details and a link to the hotel website to his email. This might not root out the problems fully but can certainly help in minimising the problem that occur due to the gap between the guest expectation and the service provided. Further it helps in creating a strong guest relationship and the ease of operations when the guest checks in.

The source of the reservation should be checked and this is a basic requirement of the front office operation as it helps in taking future decisions based on the source of business. The hotel should check the credential of the travel agent before accepting or confirming business.

There have been mistakes on both sides of the guest and the hotel. The use of Trip advisor by the guest to destroy the resort’s image and your use of this media to minimise the damage is successful ,so the use of internet or the virtual world can be for both purposes if it is monitored carefully.

Feel free to comment on the ideas or to contact me through this forum

October 30th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
 3 

The main flaw with TA is that reviews are anonymous and there’s no way of the casual observer knowing if they are genuine or not (except in cases of the most blatant spamming by owners)…

We had two fake, malicious reviews about our B&B that took 2 weeks for TA to remove. They don’t care a toss about the damage that fake reviews can do and won’t enter into dialogue with owners, no matter how serious the grievance. They hide behind their content disclaimers instead.

I’d be interested to see a hotel chain that can afford it take them to court over fake reviews – I can’t see why their disclaimers would hold up any more than a newspaper denying responsibility for what they publish.

Phil

November 3rd, 2009 at 3:06 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

Powered by Yahoo! Answers